NATS 3008 Complex Forensic Studies
Credit Points 10
Legacy Code 300911
Coordinator Val Spikmans Opens in new window
Description This is an advanced and integrating capstone unit for students studying forensic science. It incorporates previous science, forensic science and social science units to form a comprehensive examination of the functionality of forensic evidence within the contemporary Australian judicial system. This capstone highlights the needs for an interdisciplinary approach to define and critique forensic science evidence from various perspectives including science, law, criminology, policing and social science. Students are required to use their skills and knowledge with additional independent research and inquiry using a range of set literature. The unit will study a range of contemporary issues including how the judicial system evaluates the reliability of evidence from an admissibility threshold, identification evidence from CCTV, contextual bias with forensic examination, contamination issues with forensic evidence and methods of expressing forensic findings and/or significance.
Discipline Forensic Science
Student Contribution Band HECS Band 2 10cp
Check your HECS Band contribution amount via the Fees page.
Level Undergraduate Level 3 subject
Equivalent Subjects NATS 3007 - Complex Forensic Case Studies
Restrictions Students must be enrolled in 3589 Bachelor of Science (Forensic Science), 3562 Bachelor of Science (Advanced Science) (Forensic Science), MT3022 Forensic Science, MT3023 Forensic Chemistry or MT3024 Forensic Biology.
- Explain the interconnections between forensic science and its wider social and legal contexts, both within Australia and Internationally.
- Apply logical, critical and creative skills to solving a range of problems in a forensic context.
- Integrate and manage several different classes of forensic evidence within an overall case.
- Describe and evaluate an understanding of court structure and procedures.
- Explain and critique the principles of ethical and professional behaviour during a forensic case and describe the potential conflicts of interest that can occur during the collection and analysis of evidence, and its presentation in court.
2. Identification evidence: contemporary issues.
3. Identification from CCTV images.
4. Contamination of forensic evidence.
5. Contextual bias with forensic examinations.
6. Various case studies relevant to unit content.
7. Expressing forensic findings and evidence significance.
8. Daubert ruling.
The following table summarises the standard assessment tasks for this subject. Please note this is a guide only. Assessment tasks are regularly updated, where there is a difference your Learning Guide takes precedence.
|Participation and Short answer: Group work answering questions on the topic of the workshop.||500 words (x 3 workshops)||20||N||Group|
|Report on the different Courts||Report - maximum 2000 words.||25||N||Individual|
|Quizzes: Four workshop quizzes and three online quizzes – mix of short answer / multiple choice.||20 minutes per quiz (x 7 quizzes)||30||N||Individual|
|Short Answer: Short-essay questions related to contemporary issues in forensic science||300 words per response (x 4)||25||N||Individual|
Subject Contact Chris Lennard Opens in new window